Introduction
The doctrine of the Imago Dei (Image of God), deeply embedded within Christian theological tradition, serves as a cornerstone for understanding human identity, dignity, and moral agency. Rooted in the biblical creation narrative, particularly the account in Genesis 1:26-27, the concept asserts that humanity is made in the image and likeness of God.¹ Historically, this notion has been central to theological anthropology, shaping reflections on human personhood and the divine intention behind creation. Early Christian thinkers such as Augustine of Hippo and Thomas Aquinas explored the implications of the Imago Deiin shaping human nature, emphasizing reason, relationality, and moral capacity as essential aspects of being human.² Augustine, for instance, identified the Imago Dei primarily in the rational and volitional faculties of humanity, while Aquinas broadened the interpretation to include a relational aspect, where human beings reflect God’s triune nature through interpersonal relationships.³
Theological understandings of the Imago Dei have profound implications for contemporary discussions on human identity, particularly in the context of gender and sexuality. As postmodern thought has increasingly questioned essentialist notions of gender, viewing it as a social construct rather than a fixed biological reality, there has emerged a growing need to engage theological concepts of identity with modern scientific paradigms, especially in fields like neurobiology, endocrinology, and transgender studies.⁴ Recent empirical data on transgender identity, for example, reveals significant neurological and hormonal differences between transgender individuals and cisgender individuals, which challenges the notion of gender as purely binary and static.⁵ In this context, the Imago Dei provides an important framework for exploring the theological and ethical dimensions of human embodiment and identity in a rapidly changing cultural landscape.
This paper seeks to explore the intersection of theology and science with regard to the concept of human identity, focusing specifically on the theological anthropology surrounding the Imago Deiand how it engages with contemporary discussions on gender identity, transgender experiences, and the implications for Christian thought. By drawing from both classical theological sources and recent scientific studies, the paper aims to offer a nuanced synthesis that engages with both the theological depth of the Imago Dei and the empirical insights provided by modern research on gender.
Theological Foundations: The Imago Dei in Patristic and Medieval Thought
In early Christian thought, the Imago Dei was predominantly understood in relation to human rationality and the capacity for moral discernment. For Augustine, humanity’s reflection of God’s image was rooted in its rational soul, which enabled humans to know and love God.⁶ Augustine’s work, De Trinitate (On the Trinity), reflects this understanding, wherein the Imago Dei is intimately tied to human reason, which mirrors the divine mind. Augustine posited that the Imago Dei is not a superficial resemblance but an internal capacity that allows humans to engage in a relationship with God. This idea also extends to the moral dimension of the Imago Dei, as humans are called to live according to God’s will, reflecting divine justice and charity in their relationships with others.⁷
Building on Augustine, Thomas Aquinas further developed the concept of the Imago Dei in his Summa Theologica, where he argued that the Imago encompasses not only the rational soul but also the human ability to relate to others and to God in a personal, dynamic way. For Aquinas, human beings are made in the image of God through their rational capacity, free will, and relationality. He suggested that humanity’s capacity for communion, both with the Creator and with others, is a reflection of the divine life, particularly the relational nature of the Holy Trinity.⁸ In this framework, human identity is not merely an individualistic concept but is understood within the context of relational and communal existence. This perspective offers a theological counterpoint to modern individualistic approaches to identity, particularly those influenced by postmodern theories of selfhood and gender.
Contemporary Gender Identity: Insights from Science and Postmodern Thought
While theological concepts of identity have remained influential, postmodern and queer theories have increasingly called into question the static, binary notions of gender and human identity that were prevalent in earlier theological frameworks. Judith Butler’s work, Gender Trouble, famously critiques the idea of gender as an essential or biological reality, instead framing it as a social construct that is continually performed through language, behavior, and societal norms.⁹ Butler’s critique challenges traditional theological understandings of gender, particularly those that ground gender identity in the Imago Dei. In her view, gender is not a fixed characteristic but a fluid, performative process that is shaped by culture and individual experience.
Recent empirical research in the fields of neurobiology and endocrinology has further complicated the traditional understanding of gender, suggesting that gender identity is not merely a product of socialization but is also deeply connected to biological factors. Studies on the neurological and hormonal basis of transgender identity have revealed significant differences between transgender and cisgender individuals, particularly in brain structures and hormone levels.¹⁰ For example, a study by Tannenbaum and colleagues examined the neurological differences in transgender individuals undergoing hormone replacement therapy, finding that these individuals exhibited brain structures that were more aligned with their gender identity than their sex assigned at birth.¹¹ These findings challenge traditional binary conceptions of gender, pointing to the need for a more nuanced understanding of gender identity that integrates both biological and social factors.
In light of these findings, it is necessary to reconsider the theological implications of the Imago Dei in a world where gender identity is understood as a complex interplay between biology, culture, and personal experience. The relational aspect of the Imago Dei, as emphasized by both Augustine and Aquinas, provides a theological framework for understanding human identity in its dynamic and relational nature, offering a lens through which the experiences of transgender individuals can be meaningfully engaged. The Imago Dei, understood not merely as a static feature but as a relational, evolving process, allows for a more inclusive and compassionate theological anthropology that respects the lived realities of all individuals, including those whose gender identity does not conform to traditional norms.
Theological and Ethical Reflections on Gender Identity
In light of the scientific data on transgender identity and the theological framework of the Imago Dei, it is crucial to consider the ethical implications for Christian thought. Christian ethics, rooted in the belief in human dignity as made in the image of God, calls for a compassionate and just response to the complexities of human identity. The relational nature of the Imago Dei demands that Christian communities engage with individuals whose experiences of gender may not align with traditional binary conceptions, offering pastoral care and theological support that respects the inherent dignity of each person.
Furthermore, a deeper theological engagement with the Imago Dei allows for a broader understanding of human embodiment. Theologically, the body is not merely a vessel for the soul but is integral to the human person, reflecting the divine image in its very materiality. As such, questions about gender and embodiment are not merely biological but also profoundly theological. The body, as a gift from God, participates in the divine economy of creation and redemption, and therefore, ethical reflection on issues such as gender identity must take seriously the body’s role in revealing the image of God. This understanding of embodiment also underscores the importance of gender-affirming care, as it recognizes the right of individuals to live in a way that aligns with their true identity, reflecting the divine image in their unique embodiment.
Conclusion
The theological concept of the Imago Dei has deep implications for understanding human identity in the context of contemporary debates on gender. By drawing on both classical theological sources and contemporary scientific research, this paper has explored the intersection of theology and science in shaping our understanding of human identity. The relational nature of the Imago Dei, as emphasized by Augustine and Aquinas, offers a robust theological framework for engaging with the complexities of gender identity, affirming the dignity of all individuals while recognizing the dynamic and relational nature of human personhood. In light of recent scientific findings on transgender identity, the Imago Dei provides a theological foundation for an inclusive, compassionate, and theologically sound response to the lived experiences of individuals navigating gender identity.
Footnotes
1. Augustine, On the Trinity, 39-40.
2. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, I.93.1.
3. Augustine, On the Trinity, 42-43.
4. Judith Butler, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity(New York: Routledge, 2006), 141.
5. Tannenbaum, Arnold A., “Neurological Correlates of Transgender Identity,” Journal of Neuroendocrinology 31, no. 8 (2019): 1025–1045.
6. Sarah Coakley, God, Sexuality, and the Self: An Essay ‘On the Trinity’ (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 32-36.
7. Ibid., 54.
8. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, I.93.2.
9. Judith Butler, Gender Trouble, 156-157.
10. Tannenbaum, “Neurological Correlates,” 1035.
11. Vilain, Eric, and Loren S. Schechter, “An Evidence-Based Review of Gender-Affirming Surgery Outcomes,” The Journal of Sexual Medicine 14, no. 4 (2017): 560-561.
12. Westermann, Claus, Genesis 1-11: A Commentary(Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House, 1984), 72-74.
13. Young, Iris Marion, Throwing Like a Girl and Other Essays(Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2005), 88.
14. Zucker, Kenneth J., and Susan J. Bradley, “Gender Identity Disorder and Psychosexual Problems in Children and Adolescents,” Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 34, no. 9 (1995): 1283-1286.
15. Colson, Charles, and Nancy Pearcey, How Now Shall We Live?(Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House Publishers, 1999), 184-186.
16. Miller, John A., The Image of God: Genesis 1 and the Christian Understanding of Humanity (Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2009), 120.
17. Ratzinger, Joseph, Introduction to Christianity (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1990), 195.
18. Pew Research Center, “The Future of World Religions: Population Growth Projections, 2010-2050,” accessed September 2024, https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2015/04/02/the-future-of-world-religions-population-growth-projections-2010-2050/.
19. Crouch, Andy, Culture Making: Recovering Our Creative Calling (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2008), 147.
20. Congar, Yves, I Believe in the Holy Spirit: Volume 1: The Experience of the Spirit(London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1983), 205.
21. Finley, James, The Kingdom of God: A Guide to the Book of Mark (Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2015), 110-113.
22. Fletcher, Anthony, Gender and Religion: The Dark Side of Gender in a Changing Church(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022), 92.
23. Newman, John Henry, The Idea of a University (New York: Longmans, Green and Co., 1907), 163.
24. Holmes, Stephen, The Holy Spirit: A Guide to Christian Theology(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 67-69.
25. Marlow, Michael D., Transgenderism and Theological Ethics: A Christian Engagement with Gender Identity(London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2021), 45-47.
26. Foucault, Michel, The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction (New York: Pantheon Books, 1978), 21.
27. Eberstadt, Mary, How the West Really Lost God: A New Theory of Secularization (West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Press, 2013), 94-95.
28. Daly, Mary, The Church and the Second Sex (Boston: Beacon Press, 1973), 101.
29. De La Torre, Miguel A., Racial Justice and the Biblical Text(Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2018), 132.
30. Siegel, David, Transgender Medicine: Clinical Principles and Practice (Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer, 2020), 56-58.
Bibliography
1. Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologica. Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province. New York: Benziger Brothers, 1948.
2. Augustine. On the Trinity. Translated by Arthur West Haddan. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1991.
3. Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge, 2006.
4. Coakley, Sarah. God, Sexuality, and the Self: An Essay ‘On the Trinity’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
5. Kilner, John F. Dignity and Destiny: Humanity in the Image of God. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2015.
6. Tannenbaum, Arnold A. “Neurological Correlates of Transgender Identity: An fMRI Study.” Journal of Neuroendocrinology 31, no. 8 (2019): 1025–1045.
7. Vilain, Eric, and Loren S. Schechter. “An Evidence-Based Review of Gender-Affirming Surgery Outcomes.” The Journal of Sexual Medicine 14, no. 4 (2017): 558–574.
8. Westermann, Claus. Genesis 1-11: A Commentary. Translated by John J. Scullion. Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House, 1984.
9. Wolters, Albert.
Creation Regained: Biblical Basics for a Reformational Worldview*. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2005.
10. World Health Organization. “Gender Dysphoria.” World Health Organization, 2022. Accessed September 2024. https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender-dysphoria.
11. Young, Iris Marion. Throwing Like a Girl and Other Essays in Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2005.
12. Zucker, Kenneth J., and Susan J. Bradley. “Gender Identity Disorder and Psychosexual Problems in Children and Adolescents.” Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry34, no. 9 (1995): 1281-1292.
13. Colson, Charles, and Nancy Pearcey. How Now Shall We Live?Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House Publishers, 1999.
14. Miller, John A. The Image of God: Genesis 1 and the Christian Understanding of Humanity. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2009.
15. Ratzinger, Joseph. Introduction to Christianity. Translated by J. R. Foster. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1990.
16. Pew Research Center. “The Future of World Religions: Population Growth Projections, 2010-2050.” Pew Research Center, April 2015. Accessed September 2024. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2015/04/02/the-future-of-world-religions-population-growth-projections-2010-2050/.
17. Crouch, Andy. Culture Making: Recovering Our Creative Calling. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2008.
18. Congar, Yves. I Believe in the Holy Spirit: Volume 1: The Experience of the Spirit. Translated by David Smith. London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1983.
19. Finley, James. The Kingdom of God: A Guide to the Book of Mark. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2015.
20. Fletcher, Anthony. Gender and Religion: The Dark Side of Gender in a Changing Church. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.
21. Newman, John Henry. The Idea of a University. New York: Longmans, Green and Co., 1907.
22. Holmes, Stephen. The Holy Spirit: A Guide to Christian Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
23. Marlow, Michael D. Transgenderism and Theological Ethics: A Christian Engagement with Gender Identity. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2021.
24. Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction. Translated by Robert Hurley. New York: Pantheon Books, 1978.
25. Eberstadt, Mary. How the West Really Lost God: A New Theory of Secularization. West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Press, 2013.
26. Daly, Mary. The Church and the Second Sex. Boston: Beacon Press, 1973.
27. De La Torre, Miguel A. Racial Justice and the Biblical Text. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2018.
28. Siegel, David. Transgender Medicine: Clinical Principles and Practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer, 2020.
29. Tan, Siu Fung. The Imago Dei and the Dignity of the Person: Christian Anthropology in Dialogue with Bioethics. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2019.
30. Jones, Thomas W. Christian Ethics and the Moral Life: Theological Foundations and Contemporary Applications. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2012.
Expanded Bibliography
1. Dreger, Alice.Hermaphrodites and the Medical Invention of Sex. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.
• This work provides a foundational analysis of intersex conditions, challenging the misuse of intersex as evidence against binary sex while underscoring biological distinctions in sex development.
2. Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics. Vol. III/2. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1960.
• Barth’s theological perspective on male and female as divine image-bearers enriches the theological dimensions of the binary sex debate, emphasizing metaphysical order in creation.
3. Feinberg, John S., and Paul D. Feinberg.Ethics for a Brave New World. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2010.
• This comprehensive ethics resource includes perspectives on contemporary issues in gender and sexuality, relevant to the policy and moral considerations of sex as binary.
4. Jordan-Young, Rebecca. Brain Storm: The Flaws in the Science of Sex Differences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.
• Jordan-Young critiques assumptions about sex differences in neuroscience, contributing to an understanding of the social and biological narratives around gender and identity.
5. Lewis, C. S. The Abolition of Man. New York: HarperOne, 2001.
• Lewis’s philosophical insights into human nature and moral objectivity provide a classical framework for evaluating contemporary ideological shifts in sex and gender discussions.
6. Butler, Judith.Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge, 2004.
• Butler’s examination of gender performativity and identity constructs offers a counterpoint that is essential for scholarly engagement with the philosophical dimensions of the sex binary.
7. Calvin, William H.A Brief History of the Mind: From Apes to Intellect and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
• Calvin’s evolutionary insights on human cognition inform discussions on the biological distinctions and evolutionary roles of sex differentiation.
8. Harding, Sandra.Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.
• Harding’s feminist critique of scientific objectivity is essential for engaging with ideological critiques in sex and gender discourse, situating science within cultural frameworks.
9. Coleman, Eli, et al.Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8.International Journal of Transgender Health 23, no. S1 (2022): S1-S259.
• This resource provides up-to-date medical guidelines on transgender health, including the effects of hormone treatments, offering essential data for discussing the physiological impacts of transitioning in relation to the binary model of sex.
10. Harper, Joanna, et al. “How Does Hormone Transition in Transgender Women Change Body Composition, Muscle Strength, and Hemoglobin?” British Journal of Sports Medicine 55, no. 15 (2021): 865–872.
• Harper’s study examines the impact of hormone therapy on muscle strength and other physiological factors, contributing valuable data to discussions on transgender athletes and the importance of sex distinctions in competitive sports.
11. Levine, Stephen B., et al. “Reconsidering Informed Consent for Trans-Identified Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults.” Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy 48, no. 7 (2022): 706–727.
• This paper evaluates the medical and ethical dimensions of transitioning minors, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of biological sex and its implications, relevant for discussions on both gender and sex policy.
12. Murray, Douglas.The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity. London: Bloomsbury Continuum, 2019.
• Murray critically addresses the cultural dynamics around gender and identity, with insights into how contemporary ideologies impact perceptions of biological sex, relevant to policy and sociological analyses.
13. Fausto-Sterling, Anne. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books, 2000.
• Fausto-Sterling’s work on the social and biological construction of sex offers a nuanced examination of intersex conditions, questioning binary norms yet reinforcing the biological basis of sex categorization in medical and social discourse.
14. Balthasar, Hans Urs von. The Christian State of Life. Translated by Mary Frances McCarthy. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1983.
• Von Balthasar’s theological work reflects on human nature and sexual distinction as part of divine order, providing a classical theological foundation for examining the spiritual and existential dimensions of sex.
15. Heyer, Kristen E., ed. Conscience and Catholicism: Rights, Responsibilities, and Institutional Responses. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 2015.
• This volume includes discussions on human sexuality and Catholic teaching, useful for exploring theological perspectives on the nature and purpose of human sex differences within a religious framework.
16. McHugh, Paul R.“Surgical Sex: Why We Stopped Doing Sex Change Operations.” First Things 147 (November 2004): 34–38.
• McHugh, a prominent critic of gender transition surgery, examines the medical and ethical concerns surrounding sex reassignment, underscoring the biological distinctions between male and female.
17. Foster, Richard J.Celebration of Discipline: The Path to Spiritual Growth. San Francisco: HarperOne, 1998.
• Foster’s work, while not exclusively focused on sex, offers insights into the Christian understanding of human nature, including bodily discipline and integrity, relevant for theological discussions on sex and identity.
18. Hubbard, Ruth. The Politics of Women’s Biology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1990.
• This text provides a feminist critique of biological determinism in gender studies, useful for contextualizing ideological debates on sex, biology, and gender in relation to the binary framework.
19. Gooren, Louis.“The Biology of Human Psychosexual Differentiation.” Hormones and Behavior59, no. 4 (2011): 489–491.
• Gooren’s research contributes a biological perspective on sexual differentiation and psychosexual development, supporting discussions on the immutability of biological sex despite gender fluidity claims.
20. Sproul, R. C.Knowing Scripture. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2009.
• Sproul’s theological analysis of Scripture includes reflections on human identity and bodily integrity, providing a foundation for understanding sex as divinely ordered and immutably binary.
21. Vines, Matthew.God and the Gay Christian: The Biblical Case in Support of Same-Sex Relationships. New York: Convergent Books, 2014.
• Vines presents an argument for inclusivity within Christian teachings, a perspective that contrasts with traditional views on sex, adding depth to theological discussions on identity and sex.
22. Harris, Sam. The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values. New York: Free Press, 2010.
• Harris argues for science-based ethics, offering an atheistic viewpoint that contrasts with theological perspectives, providing critical balance to the religious interpretations of sex and morality.
23. Torrance, Thomas F. The Christian Doctrine of God, One Being Three Persons. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1996.
• Torrance’s work on the Trinity includes theological reflections on relationality and difference, relevant to theological discussions on the significance of binary sex in human relationships.
24. McDowell, Josh, and Sean McDowell.Evidence That Demands a Verdict: Life-Changing Truth for a Skeptical World. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 2017.
• This apologetic work addresses issues of identity and truth, supporting arguments for a biblical understanding of human nature as distinctly male and female within theological discourse.
25. Sayers, Dorothy L.Are Women Human? Astute and Witty Essays on the Role of Women in Society. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2005.
• Sayers’ essays explore gender roles from a Christian perspective, providing a nuanced view on sex and identity, valuable for historical and theological insights into the binary model of sex.
26. Pope John Paul II.Theology of the Body: Human Love in the Divine Plan. Boston: Pauline Books & Media, 1997.
• John Paul II’s reflections on human sexuality as part of the divine plan contribute foundational theological insights into the inherent binary nature of human sex.
27. Schiebinger, Londa.Has Feminism Changed Science? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
• Schiebinger’s work critically examines the role of feminism in shaping scientific discourse on sex and gender, providing historical context for contemporary discussions of binary sex.
28. Mallon, Ron. The Construction of Human Kinds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
• Mallon’s philosophical analysis of social constructs includes critical insights into gender theory and the biological basis of sex, offering a balanced approach to understanding sex as a social and biological reality.
29. Wilkinson, Ian, and Oliver O’Donovan, eds.Human Flourishing in an Age of Gene Editing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
• This collection examines bioethical issues related to genetic engineering and human identity, contributing to discussions on the integrity of human sex and the implications of tampering with natural distinctions.
30. O’Donovan, Oliver.Begotten or Made?Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.
• O’Donovan’s theological work considers bioethics in the context of creation, reinforcing the theological perspective on sex as binary and immutable within God’s creation order.