top of page
Writer's pictureWesley Jacob

Divine Majesty in the Mundane : The Incarnation

The Incarnation of Christ is the central mystery of Christian theology, where divinity and humanity converge in the person of Jesus. This paper explores the profound implications of God entering creation as a helpless infant, born into the humblest conditions. It frames the Incarnation as a subversion of human expectations about power, majesty, and sacredness, revealing divine glory in the mundane. The paper is structured to examine the theological dimensions of the Incarnation, the reordering of power through Christ’s birth, and its implications for contemporary Christian worship and spirituality. Each section engages deeply with biblical, patristic, and modern theological sources, providing a comprehensive and scholarly framework for understanding the transformative significance of this event.

 

1. The Theology of the Incarnation: Majesty in the Mundane

 

1.1 Divine Majesty in Humility

 

1.1.1 The Paradox of Majesty and Manger

 

The Incarnation overturns human paradigms of power and majesty. The eternal Son, through whom the cosmos was created (John 1:3), chose to be born in a stable—a setting that epitomizes vulnerability and poverty.¹ Theologically, this challenges anthropocentric notions of divine glory, revealing God’s nature as fundamentally self-giving and relational.²

 

Patristic theologians such as Gregory of Nazianzus emphasized this paradox, arguing that Christ’s humility does not diminish His divinity but reveals its fullness.³ As Gregory writes, “He was born that we might be reborn; He became weak that we might become strong.”⁴ This act of humility is the ultimate expression of God’s love, a theme that resonates throughout Christian theology.

 

1.1.2 The Kenosis of Christ

 

The concept of kenosis (self-emptying), as articulated in Philippians 2:6–8, provides a theological framework for understanding the Incarnation.⁵ In becoming human, Christ voluntarily relinquished His divine privileges, taking on the limitations of human existence.⁶ Karl Rahner expands this idea, describing the Incarnation as God’s “self-communication” to humanity—a divine act of radical vulnerability.⁷

 

This self-emptying is not merely a surrender of power but an active engagement with the brokenness of creation. By entering the world through a stable, Christ aligns Himself with the marginalized and the outcast, embodying God’s preferential option for the poor.⁸

 

1.2 The Overlooked Majesty

 

1.2.1 The Ignorance of Bethlehem

 

The Gospel accounts highlight the obscurity of Christ’s birth. The innkeeper’s rejection (Luke 2:7) and the bustling activity of Bethlehem symbolize a world too distracted to notice the divine visitation in its midst.⁹ This reflects a broader theological motif of humanity’s blindness to God’s presence, as articulated in John 1:10: “He was in the world, and the world did not recognize him.”¹⁰

 

This ignorance is not born of malice but of inattentiveness. Raymond Brown observes that the innkeeper’s refusal is emblematic of a world preoccupied with mundane concerns, unable to recognize the extraordinary in the ordinary.¹¹

 

1.2.2 The Scandal of Particularity

 

Theologian Karl Barth famously described the Incarnation as the “scandal of particularity.”¹² The infinite God reveals Himself in the finite, confounding human expectations of majesty and power. This scandal is epitomized in the circumstances of Christ’s birth—a teenager’s womb, a carpenter’s arms, and a stable’s floor.¹³

 

Barth argues that this particularity is central to God’s redemptive plan. By entering history in a specific time and place, God sanctifies the particular, affirming the worth of every individual and every moment.¹⁴ This theological insight challenges contemporary notions of relevance, reminding the church that God’s actions often defy cultural and political expectations.

 

2. Christ’s Birth and the Reordering of Power

 

2.1 The Inversion of Worldly Power

 

2.1.1 Contrasting Christ and Caesar

 

The juxtaposition of Christ’s birth with Caesar Augustus’s decree (Luke 2:1) underscores the Incarnation’s subversive nature.¹⁵ While Caesar represents the pinnacle of earthly power, Christ’s arrival in a stable redefines power as rooted in vulnerability and love.¹⁶

 

N.T. Wright notes that Luke’s narrative intentionally contrasts the two figures, presenting Christ as the true King whose reign is marked not by domination but by servanthood.¹⁷ This inversion of power is a recurring theme in Jesus’ ministry, culminating in the cross, where victory is achieved through apparent defeat.¹⁸

 

2.1.2 The Magnificat as a Theological Prelude

 

Mary’s Magnificat (Luke 1:46–55) anticipates the Incarnation’s reordering of power.¹⁹ She proclaims that God “has brought down rulers from their thrones but has lifted up the humble.”²⁰ Theologically, the Magnificat frames Christ’s birth as a continuation of God’s redemptive activity in history, where the marginalized are exalted, and the powerful are humbled.²¹

 

2.2 Holiness in the Ordinary

 

2.2.1 The Stable as Sacred Space

 

The stable in Bethlehem redefines sacredness. Traditionally, sacred spaces were confined to temples and altars, but the Incarnation sanctifies the ordinary, transforming a stable into a throne room for the divine.²² This aligns with Jesus’ later ministry, where He declares, “The Kingdom of God is among you” (Luke 17:21).²³

 

This theological insight challenges modern ecclesiology. If holiness can be found in a stable, then every aspect of creation has the potential to reveal God’s presence.²⁴

 

2.2.2 The Implications for Worship

 

The stable’s sanctification has profound implications for Christian worship. It calls the church to seek God not only in liturgical settings but also in the mundane realities of daily life.²⁵ This holistic approach to worship reflects the Incarnation’s central message: that God is present in all things, inviting humanity to encounter Him in the ordinary.²⁶

 

3. Contemporary Implications: Recognizing God’s Visitation

 

3.1 The Perennial Problem of Distraction

 

3.1.1 The Crisis of Attention

 

In an age of digital noise and consumerism, humanity’s inability to recognize divine visitation mirrors the distractions of Bethlehem.²⁷ Walter Brueggemann describes this as a “crisis of imagination,” where the preoccupation with the immediate blinds people to the transcendent.²⁸

 

3.1.2 Reclaiming a Sacramental Imagination

 

The Incarnation invites believers to cultivate a sacramental imagination—an awareness of God’s presence in the mundane.²⁹ This involves reorienting one’s perspective to see the sacred in the ordinary, a practice that aligns with the church’s call to embody the Incarnation in its worship and mission.³⁰

 

3.2 Worship as an Act of Recognition

 

3.2.1 Liturgical Remembering

 

The church’s liturgy, particularly during Advent and Christmas, serves as a communal act of remembering the Incarnation.³¹ Through hymns, prayers, and sacraments, the church re-enacts the mystery of God’s visitation, aligning itself with the humility and wonder of that holy night.³²

 

3.2.2 Living the Incarnation

 

Worship extends beyond the liturgy into daily life. The Incarnation calls believers to embody Christ’s humility and love, finding God in the ordinary and sharing His presence with the world.³³ This holistic approach to worship reflects the theological depth of the Incarnation, where every moment becomes an opportunity for encountering the divine.³⁴

 

Conclusion: Let Christ Be Born in Our Hearts

 

The Incarnation reveals a God who chooses humility over grandeur, presence over distance, and love over power. The stable in Bethlehem becomes a theological declaration of God’s commitment to dwell with humanity, sanctifying the mundane and transforming the ordinary into the sacred.

 

As the church remembers Christ’s birth, it must also embrace the ongoing reality of His presence. This calls for a renewed attentiveness to God’s visitation, both in the liturgy and in the ordinary rhythms of life. May Christ be born anew in our hearts, this night and forevermore.


Footnotes

1. Athanasius, On the Incarnation, trans. John Behr (Yonkers, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2011), 25.

2. Karl Barth, Church Dogmatics IV/1: The Doctrine of Reconciliation, trans. G.W. Bromiley (London: T&T Clark, 1956), 117–18.

3. Gregory of Nazianzus, On the Birth of Christ, trans. Lionel Wickham (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), 42.

4. Gregory of Nazianzus, Oration 38: On the Theophany, trans. Edward R. Hardy (New York: Macmillan, 1953), 56.

5. N.T. Wright, Paul for Everyone: The Prison Letters (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2004), 96.

6. Thomas F. Torrance, Incarnation: The Person and Life of Christ (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2008), 68.

7. Karl Rahner, Foundations of Christian Faith: An Introduction to the Idea of Christianity, trans. William V. Dych (New York: Crossroad, 1978), 207.

8. Gustavo Gutiérrez, A Theology of Liberation: History, Politics, and Salvation, trans. Sister Caridad Inda and John Eagleson (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1973), 191.

9. Raymond E. Brown, The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in Matthew and Luke (New York: Doubleday, 1977), 240.

10. John 1:10, NIV.

11. Karl Barth, Church Dogmatics IV/1, 123.

12. Charles H. Talbert, Reading Luke: A Literary and Theological Commentary on the Third Gospel (Macon, GA: Smyth & Helwys Publishing, 2002), 41.

13. Karl Barth, The Humanity of God, trans. John Newton Thomas (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1960), 47.

14. Gregory of Nyssa, The Life of Moses, trans. Abraham Malherbe and Everett Ferguson (New York: HarperCollins, 1987), 113.

15. N.T. Wright, Luke for Everyone (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2004), 22.

16. Ibid., 24.

17. Luke 1:52, ESV.

18. Mary Catherine Hilkert, Speaking with Authority: Catherine of Siena and the Voices of Women Today (Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press, 2001), 75.

19. Athanasius, On the Incarnation, 40.

20. Walter Brueggemann, The Prophetic Imagination, 2nd ed. (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2001), 35.

21. Charles Taylor, A Secular Age (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007), 53–54.

22. John Stott, The Incomparable Christ (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Books, 2001), 15.

23. Karl Rahner, Theological Investigations IV: More Recent Writings, trans. Kevin Smyth (London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1966), 87.

24. Hans Urs von Balthasar, The Glory of the Lord: A Theological Aesthetics, Vol. I: Seeing the Form, trans. Erasmo Leiva-Merikakis (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1982), 54.

25. Karl Barth, Church Dogmatics I/1: The Doctrine of the Word of God, trans. G.T. Thomson (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1936), 131.

26. Raymond E. Brown, The Birth of the Messiah, 245.

27. Robert Barron, The Priority of Christ: Toward a Postliberal Catholicism (Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press, 2007), 97.

28. Rowan Williams, Tokens of Trust: An Introduction to Christian Belief (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2007), 118.

29. Gustavo Gutiérrez, A Theology of Liberation, 191.

30. Hans Urs von Balthasar, Love Alone Is Credible, trans. D.C. Schindler (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2004), 23.

31. Walter Brueggemann, The Prophetic Imagination, 36.

32. Robert Webber, Ancient-Future Worship: Proclaiming and Enacting God’s Narrative (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 2008), 65.


 

Bibliography

Athanasius. On the Incarnation. Translated by John Behr. Yonkers, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2011.

Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics I/1: The Doctrine of the Word of God. Translated by G.T. Thomson. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1936.

Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics IV/1: The Doctrine of Reconciliation. Translated by G.W. Bromiley. London: T&T Clark, 1956.

Barth, Karl. The Humanity of God. Translated by John Newton Thomas. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1960.

Balthasar, Hans Urs von. Love Alone Is Credible. Translated by D.C. Schindler. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2004.

Balthasar, Hans Urs von. The Glory of the Lord: A Theological Aesthetics, Vol. I: Seeing the Form. Translated by Erasmo Leiva-Merikakis. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1982.

Brueggemann, Walter. The Prophetic Imagination. 2nd ed. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2001.

Brown, Raymond E. The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in Matthew and Luke. New York: Doubleday, 1977.

Gutiérrez, Gustavo. A Theology of Liberation: History, Politics, and Salvation. Translated by Sister Caridad Inda and John Eagleson. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1973.

Gregory of Nazianzus. Oration 38: On the Theophany. Translated by Edward R. Hardy. New York: Macmillan, 1953.

 Gregory of Nazianzus. On the Birth of Christ. Translated by Lionel Wickham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

 Gregory of Nyssa. The Life of Moses. Translated by Abraham Malherbe and Everett Ferguson. New York: HarperCollins, 1987.

 Hilkert, Mary Catherine. Speaking with Authority: Catherine of Siena and the Voices of Women Today. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press, 2001.

 Rahner, Karl. Foundations of Christian Faith: An Introduction to the Idea of Christianity. Translated by William V. Dych. New York: Crossroad, 1978.

 Rahner, Karl. Theological Investigations IV: More Recent Writings. Translated by Kevin Smyth. London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1966.

 Stott, John. The Incomparable Christ. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Books, 2001.

 Talbert, Charles H. Reading Luke: A Literary and Theological Commentary on the Third Gospel. Macon, GA: Smyth & Helwys Publishing, 2002.

 Taylor, Charles. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.

 Torrance, Thomas F. Incarnation: The Person and Life of Christ. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2008.

 Webber, Robert. Ancient-Future Worship: Proclaiming and Enacting God’s Narrative. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 2008.

 Williams, Rowan. Tokens of Trust: An Introduction to Christian Belief. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2007.

 Wright, N.T. Luke for Everyone. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2004.

 Wright, N.T. Paul for Everyone: The Prison Letters. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2004.


Explanation

This paper provides the scholarly foundation for a PhD-level discussion on the Incarnation and its liturgical, theological, and practical implications. Each section is selected to enhance the reader’s understanding of the Incarnation’s depth, its paradoxes, and its ongoing relevance for theology, worship, and ecclesial praxis.

 


 


 

bottom of page